Learn how to use technology tools in practical ways to support explanations and modelling in your maths lessons, with Mark Anderson.

Clear explanations and well-chosen models sit at the centre of effective mathematics teaching. When students can see the structure of an idea and hear the reasoning behind each step, they are better placed to make sense of new content and to apply methods with confidence. 

Digital tools can add real value when used with care and purpose, helping teachers to represent ideas with clarity, reduce unnecessary load, and offer students another route into understanding. Here, we explore some practical ways technology can support explanations and modelling in maths, across both primary and secondary classrooms.

Why explanations and modelling matter in maths 

Explaining and modelling in maths demand precision. Students often meet ideas that are abstract or counterintuitive, so they need models that reveal underlying structure and make things clear.

The EEF’s Improving Mathematics in Key Stages 2 and 3 guidance highlights the importance of using representations that expose relationships and support sense making, rather than illustrations that decorate the page. Likewise, worked examples help reduce cognitive load by giving students a clear path through new material, allowing them to focus on understanding the method rather than juggling every decision at once. 

Digital technology can strengthen these processes when it offers something more precise, flexible or accessible than pen and paper. The goal remains clarity and helping students grasp both method and reasoning. 

4 ways to use tech tools to enhance your explanations and modelling

1. Use dynamic representations to reveal structure

Mathematics is full of relationships that shift as one quantity changes. Dynamic tools such as GeoGebra or Desmos allow teachers to show these changes in real time, making the mathematical structure more visible. With a simple slider, a straight line can steepen or flatten, a quadratic can widen or narrow, and a transformation can be played forwards or backwards with accuracy that is difficult to achieve on a board.

In primary classrooms, dynamic fraction tools or angle applets can show, for example, how adjusting one part of a shape affects another. Rather than drawing repeated diagrams, teachers can focus their explanation on the relationships at play, guiding pupils towards noticing what stays the same and what changes.

In secondary settings, being able to link an equation, its graph and a table of values side by side, helps students see how each representation reinforces the others. Recent classroom research shows that students taught geometry with GeoGebra-assisted instruction gained stronger conceptual understanding of geometric ideas than those taught through conventional approaches. The real benefit comes from being able to control what students attend to. A single adjustment can spark a discussion about gradient, scale, symmetry or rate of change, without the distraction of redrawing the entire example.

2. Strengthen conceptual understanding with virtual manipulatives

Manipulatives have long supported learning in maths, especially in primary classrooms where students build early number sense. Virtual manipulatives extend this by offering a level of precision and flexibility that is harder to maintain with concrete resources. Blocks snap neatly into place, algebra tiles hold their shape, and number lines adjust seamlessly. Many tools also display symbolic notation alongside the visual model, helping students make the important transition from concrete to abstract.

For primary students, virtual base ten blocks or bar models can help explain regrouping in addition and subtraction or represent fractions with accuracy. Students can adjust the model and immediately see the corresponding symbolic changes, reinforcing understanding rather than memorisation.

In secondary classrooms, algebra tiles or balance model representations support explanations for expanding brackets, factorising and solving equations. They offer a bridge between the physical arrangement of tiles and the symbolic structure of an expression. A meta-analysis of virtual manipulatives, synthesising 66 studies, reported moderate positive effects on mathematics achievement – when these tools were used alongside explicit teaching and clear links to notation.

Virtual tools also support inclusion. Students with fine motor difficulties may find digital movement easier – and teachers can scale, zoom or adjust colour contrast to suit students’ needs. As with all technology, the value lies in how the representation is used, not in the tool itself.

3. Capture and revisit modelling with screencasting and digital ink

One of the challenges in maths is that live explanations disappear as soon as they are rubbed off the board. Screencasting offers teachers a way to capture their modelling so that students can revisit key steps later. A short recording of a worked example, with digital ink and narration, gives students access to the teacher’s reasoning at their own pace. They can pause, replay or slow the explanation without feeling rushed.

This approach supports both primary and secondary learners. In primary, teachers might record a slow, deliberate explanation of how to set out column subtraction or how to interpret a bar chart. In secondary, recordings might cover solving simultaneous equations, working with standard form or constructing loci.

Research shows that visual, interactive screencasts can make conceptual learning more accessible and help students develop a deeper understanding of key ideas. As it says in this research paper:

“mathscasts… enable students to develop deeper understanding of key foundational concepts… [and] provide explanations of complex concepts and reinforcement of concepts previously learnt.” 

Departments often find that building a small library of method videos brings consistency, so pupils hear the same language and layout across classes.

A simple visualiser can also make modelling more effective. Teachers can annotate directly onto textbooks, worksheets or students’ work, making the explanation feel immediate and supported with familiar resources.

4. Enrich mathematical talk through student-generated explanations

When students explain a method, they deepen their own understanding. Digital tools enable more students to contribute without the pressure of standing at the front of the class. A short screen recording, where a student explains a method using a stylus or mouse, offers powerful insights into their understanding of the concept.

In primary classrooms, pupils might narrate how they partition a number, build an array or interpret a bar model. In secondary settings, they might explain their choice of method for expanding brackets or talk through a graphing decision. These recordings help teachers identify gaps in understanding and allow students to rehearse mathematical language with precision.

This practice aligns with research showing that structured explanation and worked example analysis can support problem solving and reduce errors. With technology, the process becomes more inclusive and easier to manage.

 

General tips for getting started

  • Use technology only when it adds genuine value to explanations and modelling.
  • Keep screens uncluttered so students’ attention stays on the mathematics (using a tool such as classroom.cloud) 
  • Use digital tools to reveal structure and model thinking, not just for the sake of using the technology.
  • Build routines for students to explain their reasoning using simple recording tools, such as screen recording over a tool such as Geogebra or recording template slides on PowerPoint (or similar). 
  • Share resources across the department so modelling becomes consistent and sustainable.

Summary

Technology can sharpen explanations and modelling in maths when it helps teachers show structure with greater precision, reduce unnecessary load and make thinking visible. Its value lies in purposeful use, supported by strong subject knowledge and clear pedagogical intent.

When selected with a clear purpose and embedded in practice, digital tools can support students in making sense of mathematics and applying methods with confidence.

References

  1. EEF (2017) ‘Improving Mathematics in Key Stages 2 and 3’. Available at: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/maths-ks-2-3 (Accessed: 9th December 2025)
  2. Gurmu, F; Tuge, C; Bekele and Hunde, A (2024) ‘Effects of GeoGebra-assisted instructional methods on students’ conceptual understanding of geometry’. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2379745 (Accessed: 9th December 2025)
  3. Moyer – Packenham, P and Wetenskow, A (2013) ‘Effects of Virtual Manipulatives on Student Achievement and Mathematics Learning’. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1154970 (Accessed: 9th December 2025)
  4. McLoughlin, C and Loch, B (2016) ‘Building cognitive bridges in mathematics: exploring the role of screencasting in scaffolding flexible learning and engagement’. Available at: https://2016conference.ascilite.org/wp-content/uploads/ascilite2016_mcloughlin_full-1.pdf (Accessed: 10th December 2025)
  5. EEF (2025) ‘Guidance Report: Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning’. Available at: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/metacognition (Accessed: 10th December 2025)

Author

  • Mark Anderson

    Mark is a global speaker, EdTech expert, trainer, blogger, author and key note speaker, known as the ICT Evangelist. He has over 20 years of experience in the classroom. Mark is the head of education at NetSupport, an Independent Thinking associate, an MIE Expert and fellow of the Chartered College of Teaching. His latest book can be found at edtechplaybook.com.

    twitter icon
    LinkedIn icon
    Website icon

    View all posts